Saturday, April 12, 2008

The future of music recording and encoding











The future of music recording

A computer model of the clarinet was built

A virtual player for the virtual clarinet was created

Maybe the future of music recording lies in reproducing performers and not recording them. Sounds strange, doesn’t it?

Humans can manipulate their tongue, breath, and fingers only so fast, so in theory recorders shouldn’t really have to measure the music many thousands of times a second like it is done on a CD.

As a result, researchers may have found the absolute least amount of data needed to reproduce a piece of music.

The researchers at the University of Rochester have digitally reproduced music in a file nearly 1,000 times smaller than a regular MP3 file.

Two innovations

The music, a 20-second clarinet solo, is encoded in less than a single kilobyte, and is made possible by two innovations: recreating in a computer both the real-world physics of a clarinet and the physics of a clarinet player.

In replaying the music, a computer literally reproduces the original performance based on everything it knows about clarinets and clarinet playing. Two of Mark Bocko (professor of electrical and computer engineering and co-creator of the technology)’s doctoral students, Xiaoxiao Dong and Mark Sterling, worked with Bocko to measure every aspect of a clarinet that affects its sound — from the backpressure in the mouthpiece for every different fingering, to the way sound radiates from the instrument, according to a University of Rochester press release.

They then built a computer model of the clarinet, and the result is a virtual instrument built entirely from the real-world acoustical measurements. The team then set about creating a virtual player for the virtual clarinet. They modelled how a clarinet player interacts with the instrument including the fingerings, the force of breath, and the pressure of the player’s lips to determine how they would affect the response of the virtual clarinet.

Then, says Bocko, it’s a matter of letting the computer “listen” to a real clarinet performance to infer and record the various actions required to create a specific sound. The original sound is then reproduced by feeding the record of the player’s actions back into the computer model.

Including ‘tonguing’

“We are still working on including ‘tonguing,’ or how the player strikes the reed with the tongue to start notes in staccato passages,” says Bocko. “But in music with more sustained and connected notes the method works quite well and it’s difficult to tell the synthesized sound from the original.”

At present the results are a very close, though not yet a perfect, representation of the original sound. Bocko believes that the quality will continue to improve as the acoustic measurements and the resulting synthesis algorithms become more accurate, and he says this process may represent the maximum possible data compression of music.

More intuitive ways

As the method is refined the researchers imagine that it may give computer musicians more intuitive ways to create expressive music by including the actions of a virtual musician in computer synthesizers.

And although the human vocal tract is highly complex, Bocko says the method may in principle be extended to vocals as well.

The current method handles only a single instrument at a time.

However in other work in the University’s Music Research Lab with post-doctoral researcher Gordana Velikic and Dave Headlam, professor of music theory at the University of Rochester’s Eastman School of Music, the team has produced a method of separating multiple instruments in a mix so the two methods can be combined to produce a very compact recording.

Thursday, April 10, 2008

भारतीय सिंचन विधान

An ingenious irrigation technique for small holdings
It is low cost, farmer friendly, easy to install and requires no maintanence
— PHOTO:

Traditional method: The pot with the cotton wick fixed at the bottom being buried near a coconut palm.
A depleting water table and rise in salinity because of indiscriminate use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides have made water conservation imperative for farmers.

Over the years, several water harvesting and conservation methods have been adopted in agriculture to recharge and conserve ground water. Some of the methods practised and still in use by local farmers are cost effective and proven.

For example, in the coastal areas of Kerala, farmers have been using a simple indigenous technique called pitcher irrigation which greatly reduces the demand for water.

Cost effective

Pitcher irrigation is cost effective, farmer-friendly, and easy to install. Unlike present day sprinkler and drip irrigation, pitcher irrigation involves no high tech gadgets and does not require any maintenance, according to Dr. V.S. Devadas, Professor, Agricultural Research Station (ARS), Kerala Agricultural University (KAU), Chalakudy, Thrissur.

It is ideal for small holdings (1-2 acres) and suitable for growing vegetables, coconuts, and arecanuts. It consists of a clay pot with a cotton wick fixed at the bottom of the pot, and buried in the soil (upto to its neck) and filled with water.

Water supply

The natural pores in the pot allow the water to spread into the soil, creating moisture for crop growth. The water can be filled as and when required, thus maintaining a continuous supply of water to the plants.

While burying the pitcher in the soil, farmers should take care to see that the neck region of the pot is positioned in such a manner that rainwater runoff does not enter into the pitcher, as otherwise small sand particles will block the pores of the pitcher.

Water penetration

“The main advantage of the wick which is attached at the bottom of the pot is to increase the water penetration into the soil and to deliver the water directly to the plant roots. Water seepage from the pitcher depends on the soil, plant type, and climate.

“The number of pitchers required per acre depends on the crop variety grown. For irrigated vegetables such as bitter gourd about 2,500 pots will be required for a hectare of land (1000 pots per acre),” explained Prof. K.V. Peter, Professor of Horticulture and Former Vice-Chancellor, KAU.

For coconut seedlings about 170 pots per hectare (that is 70 pots per acre), and for arecanut about 1100 pots (440 pots per acre) will be required.

The approximate cost will be Rs.10-12 per pot when purchased in bulk. The total cost may come to about Rs.10000 to Rs. 12,000 per acre for vegetables and Rs.700 to Rs.840 for coconut and Rs.4,400-Rs. 5,500 for arecanut seedlings. (Pitcher irrigation is usually practised for 2 to 3 years during the seedling stage of coconut and arecanut)

Irrigation area

“A farmer can easily irrigate 2-3 acres using this simple technology and save 90 per cent of water as compared to flood irrigation. Fertilizers can also be mixed along with the water and poured into the pot. Weed growth has been found to be very minimal because water delivery is limited to the roots,” said Dr. Peter. Today, when many farmers have turned to drip irrigation, how will they accept this traditional technology?

Operating skill

Drip and sprinkler irrigation are mainly for large areas. Big farmers can easily afford to install them. But you cannot expect a small farmer having 1-2 acres to invest Rs. 25,000 to Rs.75,000 for such systems. Also some of the latest irrigation technologies need a certain degree of skill to operate them, and are not farmer-friendly, according to Dr. Peter. In a number of instances the after sales service and periodical meetings with the farmer to check the efficiency of the irrigation systems is rarely done.

Minimal requirement

It is the poor farmer who has to make umpteen telephone calls and travel to the company to register his complaint. Whereas simple technologies such as the pitcher do not need any such requirements, according to Dr. K.S. Purushan, Dean (fisheries), College of Fisheries, Panangad, Kochi.

The Agriculture Research Station, Chalakudy under the Kerala Agricultural University has demonstrated the usefulness of this traditional practice to farmers.

Many farmers in the coastal districts are following this method to manage irrigation for higher productivity and freedom from infestations such as wilt and damping off in their vegetable fields.

Readers can contact Prof. K.V. Peter, Professor of Horticulture and Former Vice-Chancellor, KAU, PO, Vellanikkara, Thrissur, Kerala, email: kvptr@yahoo.com, mobile: 9446513017.

हमने दिशा काही , गति नही

‘We anticipated the direction but not the speed’
— Photo: ADITYA

BioFuel from cellulose: Instead of using the grains we are looking at cellulose based sources of carbon to produce energy, says Thomas M. Connelly, Executive Vice President & Chief Innovation Officer of DuPont.
In the 19th Century, DuPont, a U.S. based company, was producing explosives. One century later, it became a chemical company. It became one of the leaders in chemistry and material science and produced products like nylon and Teflon that are used by millions every day. DuPont is ranked number one among chemical companies for the number of patents filed by the Chemicals Patent Scorecard. With the arrival of the 21st Century, the company has also taken to biofuels and agriculture. When a company that has produced many innovative products from petroleum trains its guns on biofuels, one can be sure that the name of the game is changing. Dr. Thomas M. Connelly, Executive Vice President & Chief Innovation Officer, DuPont, United States, spoke to R. Prasad on how the company forayed into biofuels and the way the company deals with patents filed. Excerpts: What made DuPont get into biotechnology?

DuPont has been in the chemistry and material science business. Our Chairman looked at what next is good for the company and recognised the rapid pace of development in life sciences, biology and biotechnology. We looked at biology as a promising area in the 21st Century.

I want to emphasize that chemistry and material science are still key enabling technologies. We wanted to add to these the new strands of life sciences. We wanted to restrict to agriculture, nutrition, industrial biotechnology particularly taking biology into areas of fuels, materials and other areas as well. But we were clear that we did not want to get into pharmaceuticals.

Any particular reason for DuPont not getting into pharmaceuticals?

Competing with other pharmaceuticals companies is something we decided against. We will not bring anything special. We will simply be another participant and there are many capable players in that area already. We look to other areas to participate in human health but not in pharmaceuticals. We are not saying no to human health but to be yet another drug company, we said no to it.

Some of your biotechnology products use food crops as raw material. Don’t you feel that you are diverting food crops to produce biofuels?

We are looking at other additional sources beyond food crops. We anticipated this when we began our work in 2002-03 when we began our work on cellulose as an additional source of carbon.

We recognised that the future of bio-based space will be constrained by the limitation of carbon from food crops. We began to work with the U.S. Department of Energy in a project in 2003 to use other parts of the plant. So instead of using the grains we are looking at cellulose based sources of carbon to produce energy. We have had a running start because long before the world realised the fuel versus food debate, we knew we had to get there.

Back in 2003 nobody was talking about this. In 2008 it is a big prominent question. We thought we had a decade to get there. Now we recognise that we got to get there much faster.

But how is it that DuPont, which thinks much ahead of others, was caught on the wrong foot on this issue of using food crops?

It is not a question we did not recognise. We thought the timescale on which we will move there would be different. Keep in mind, for example, that certain other agricultural commodities were trading at low prices for decades. And frankly, many farmers were looking for additional markets for their products.

So while we recognised that in time the supply trends would become a limiting factor, that the grand plan would accelerate in a matter of five years we never anticipated. We thought it would be at least ten years. The pace at which this has been progressing has been surprising to us.

I think it is because of the global emphasis on climate change, run up in the prices of petroleum. All these are pushing us to non-food crop sources of carbon material for the production of fuel.

I should say we anticipated the direction but not the speed at which we would reach there.

How are you utilising your strengths in chemistry to produce biofuels?

We have focussed our attention on fermentation based processing of sugar from cellulose to ethanol or higher alcohol products. I would say the important thing is that we were able to combine market insight with foresight. Of course with the technology we have and what we can develop we will get to the intersection in the future before our competitors can get there.

Why do you use fermentation technology?

If you take fermentation based processing along with non-grain based sources of carbon then there is a good potential to produce very large volumes of biofuel. Vegetable based oil has certain limitations. There will ultimately be a volume constraint.

How close are you to converting cellulose to ethanol?

We can convert cellulose material to ethanol today. The question is the economic challenge of doing this at the same cost as grain based ethanol. Our goal is to achieve a firm authority by 2010 in the research laboratory. If we pilot it we should be able to commercialise in reasonable quantities by 2012.

What is the total number of patents filed so far by Dupont?

At the end of 2007, DuPont had over 20,000 patents in force globally with over 6,000 of these in the U.S. DuPont filed nearly 2,000 patent applications in the U.S. in 2007. This number has been increasing by about 6 per cent per year over the last several years.

Do you take every patent filed to the final product stage?

No, patents have other strategic purposes including, for example, broad protection of a technology space.

What do you do with those that the company is not interested in taking forward?

We typically license rather than sell our intellectual property. Licensing is an option we consider and actively pursue in some cases. We average 10 to 30 patent licenses annually.

How do you see this as a business model — filing patents and then licensing them to third parties?

We do not view patent licensing as a business model, but rather as a value capture strategy from our R&D effort in those instances where we have intellectual property that is no longer aligned with our businessstrategies.

What is the ballpark figure on the revenue generated by adopting this strategy?

Licensing income reported in our Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)Form 10K Annual Report for 2007 was $125 million.

फ्लश मेमोरी तवे मी

IT’s no ‘flash’ in the pan
Flash may be the preferred solution for PC and mobile memory needs


Solid advantage: Flash storage as a replacement for the hard drive in portable PC’s may hit 128 GB by year end.
For India, 2008 is shaping up as the year of ultra mobile personal computing (UMPC). Consider the quick succession of launches in the UMPC space: Intel’s Classmate PC is now on offer in the avatar of the HCL MiLeapX. Allied Computers has launched the Ethos UMPC, while Asus has brought its EeePC to India. Storage medium

All these machines sport a screen size of just 7 inches or smaller — but there is another feature they share: All three product families have jettisoned the hard disk drive as a storage medium for a much more rugged, solid state drive based on reusable, non volatile (that is it retains the data even when power is switched off) Flash memory.

Last week, Sanjay Mehrotra, co-founder (with Eli Harari), President and Chief Operating Officer of the California-based Sandisk Corporation, a market leader in the Flash memory business and the company that invented the Flash storage card and Flash USB drive, was in Bangalore.

He showed me a solid state drive for portable computers, just 5 mm thick and weighing 40 grams. It could store 64 GB of data and was lighter by a third than a hard drive of similar capacity.

By June this year, 72 GB models will be available, he assured me and by year-end he expected SanDisk to be offering 128 GB versions. Admittedly, this comes at a stiffer price compared to hard disk drives. But that is how technology works in this business… high prices till demand for volumes build up.

System boot

SanDisk is not waiting for this to happen. For PC manufacturers who would like to give their customers the best of both worlds, the company recently launched the Vaulter disk, a flash-based module that speeds up system boot up, application load-up and retrieval of files while it works in conjunction with a hard drive that performs other storage functions.

The two drives operate in parallel, increasing the overall speed and efficiency of the PC or laptop.

In addition to the ubiquitous USB or Universal Serial Bus drive also known as the thumb drive or memory stick, which these days can be had in India in sizes up to 16 GB for around Rs. 2,500, Flash can be found inside digital cameras, pocket PCs, hand held MP3 players or games consoles — and increasingly in mobile phones.

Small sizes

By 2011, expect to see the smallest of these — the kind that go into mobile phone slots — available in sizes of 128 GB or more, says Gavin Wu, SanDisk’s Hong Kong-based Managing Director for Asia-Pacific.

It is possible to squeeze so much data into a thumb-nail sized device because companies like SanDisk, Samsung or Toshiba have gone double or triple deck stacking the memory cells so that each of them stores 2 or 3 bits of information.

This is called a multi level cell or MLC and later this month SanDisk and Toshiba will jointly launch the world’s first 16-GB 3-bits per cell Flash chip.

It will use what is known as NAND Flash architecture — this means the cells are connected in series, resembling a NAND gate. The vast majority of commercial Flash storage modules are NAND devices — as against NOR Flash where the cells are connected in parallel like NOR logic gates.

NAND Flash reading speeds will be an order of magnitude slower than NOR Flash speeds — while writing speeds will be faster.

Consumer choice

This is acceptable for the type of applications to which Flash memory is put today and the advantage of being able to stack more NAND Flash cells into a given space has made it the mass consumer choice. But NOR Flash is not about to roll over and die. There are many applications where memory has to be written only rarely, but read very often and very fast — like the BIOS settings in a PC.

And soon after Dr Fujio Masuoka of Toshiba announced his invention of Flash Memory in1984, Intel saw the huge potential of NOR Flash as a substitute for that older Ready Only Memory or ROM chip and invested heavily in the technology.

Long time partner

Why are we telling these old stories today? Because earlier this month, Intel finally hived off all its technology in (mostly) NOR Flash, and joined hands with long time partner ST Microelectronics and created a new company called Numonyx, headquartered in Switzerland.

The new entity will harness the fruits of their joint innovation in creating memory by an entirely new process, that is already exciting semiconductor material scientists: It is called PCM or Phase Change Memory and might well be the first big breakthrough in NOR Flash for almost 30 years.

Crystalline structures

In PCM, the microscopic bit is heated to anything up to 600 degrees celsius; this melts the bit which when cooled solidifies into one of two crystalline structures which represent a one or a zero.

Sounds complicated? Yes; but the reward is that PCM can sustain tens of millions instead of tens of thousands of read-write cycles compared to NAND Flash.

Reading data is as fast as NOR Flash, writing is as fast as NAND Flash — so you have a device that is the best of all existing Flash technologies.

Shrinking tolerance

So it seems the innovations in NAND Flash and PCM will continue apace for some more time to come, shrinking the manufacturing tolerance to 45 nanometres and beyond, squeezing more and more cells on every square cm. of substrate till a gigabyte will reduce to a dot, invisible to the naked eye.

Players like Intel and SanDisk are harnessing the efforts of their India-based engineers in this quest. Flash is clearly the way memory is going these days — and that’s no flash in the pan!

बियो इंधन से बर्बादी

Ethanol pollution in Gulf of Mexico While the search for alternative fuels is in full swing in many countries in order to reduce dependency on pollution causing conventional fuels an ironic situation is emerging where the rush in the United States to produce corn-based ethanol as an alternative fuel will likely worsen pollution in the Gulf of Mexico and expand the annual ‘dead zone.’

The U.S. Senate recently announced a production target of 36 billion gallons annually by the year 2022, which is more than three times the amount of ethanol produced in 2006.

Nitrogen loading

If the United States were to meet this target, nitrogen loading from the Mississippi River into the Gulf of Mexico would increase by 10 to 19 percent.

In the first study of its kind, lead author Simon Donner of the University of British Columbia and Chris Kucharik of the University of Wisconsin-Madison modelled the effects of biofuel production on nutrient pollution in an aquatic system.

Their findings are published online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The researchers looked at the estimated amounts of land and fertilizer needed to meet future production goals for corn-based ethanol.

As a result of nitrogen loading, they predict nitrogen levels would rise to twice their recommended levels, leading to an expansion of the Gulf’s dead zone, a region of oxygen-starved waters that is unable to support aquatic life.

Suspicion confirmed

“This result confirms our suspicion that there’s a significant trade-off to the expanded production of ethanol from corn grain,” says Kucharik, a scientist with the UW-Madison Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies.

“It also shows that we need to continue considering our options for other biofuel feedstocks.

And when we do, we need to keep the greater impacts on ecosystems in mind.” Their results call into question the assumption that enough land exists to fulfil the current demand for feed crops, while at the same time allowing an expansion of corn production for fuel, according to a University of Wisconsin-Madison press release.

Nitrogen and phosphorus from agricultural fertilizers have been found to promote excessive growth of algae in water bodies, a problem that’s common across North America and in many areas of the world. In some cases, the decomposition of algae consumes much of the oxygen in the water.

Fertilizer applied to cornfields in the central U.S. is the primary source of nitrogen pollution in the Mississippi River system, which drains into the Gulf of Mexico.

Each summer, the export of nitrogen creates a large dead zone in the Gulf that has expanded in recent years to more than 20,000 square kilometres.

Donner and Kucharik arrived at their figures by combining the agricultural land use scenarios required to meet future demand for corn-based ethanol with models of terrestrial and aquatic nitrogen cycling.

Reduction required

The scientists conclude that boosting ethanol production from U.S. croplands without endangering water quality and aquatic ecosystems will require a substantial reduction in the amount of corn that is grown for animal feed and meat production.